Penetration Testing & Application Security

OWASP WSTG v4.2 web app testing, ASVS Level 1-3 verification, and NIST SP 800-115 network pen tests by CREST and OSCP-credentialed testers.

Penetration testing illustration

Why Pen Testing Matters

Penetration testing methodology matters as much as the testers' skill. We work from documented frameworks: OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) v4.2 for web applications (covers 11 control categories from information gathering through business logic and client-side testing), OWASP API Security Top 10 for API testing, OWASP ASVS Level 1-3 for verification depth, and NIST SP 800-115 for network and infrastructure testing. PCI DSS and SOC 2 audits ask which methodology you used; checking that box matters.

Engagement scope determines depth and duration. Black-box (no internal knowledge, ~simulates external attacker) takes longer and finds different findings than gray-box (some access and architecture knowledge, more typical and cost-effective). White-box (full source-code access, ASVS L3-style) is appropriate for high-stakes pre-launch reviews. We help you pick the right combination based on threat model, compliance driver (annual PCI 11.3 vs continuous SOC 2 evidence vs pre-launch sign-off), and budget.

Our testing team holds CREST CRT, OSCP, OSWE, and Burp Suite Certified Practitioner credentials. Findings are delivered in a structured report with CVSS v3.1 severity scoring, reproduction steps, evidence, and prioritized remediation guidance -- not a Nessus PDF dump. Re-test of remediated findings is included in the engagement so you can close the audit loop. Because our team's roots span both offensive testing and engineering ops, recommendations are pragmatic about implementation cost rather than hand-wavy.

Penetration testing diagram

Why Choose Our Penetration Testing & Application Security

Engineering rigor, audit-ready process, and operational depth across cloud, SaaS, and software delivery

Vulnerability Discovery

OWASP WSTG v4.2 methodology with manual exploitation, not just automated scanner output. Tools include Burp Suite Pro, Nessus, Nuclei, sqlmap, and custom tooling for application-specific logic flaws.

Vulnerability Discovery

Actionable Insights

CVSS v3.1-scored findings with reproduction steps, evidence screenshots, and remediation guidance scoped to your stack. Re-test of remediated findings included so you close the audit loop.

Actionable Insights

Compliance

Reports satisfy PCI DSS Requirement 11.3 (annual external and internal pen test plus segmentation testing for in-scope networks), SOC 2 CC7.1, ISO 27001 Annex A.12, and HIPAA risk assessment requirements.

Compliance

Our Penetration Testing Process

A methodical approach from scoping to remediation verification.

1

Scoping & Rules of Engagement

One week: define test scope (URLs, IP ranges, authenticated user accounts, exclusions), test type (black/gray/white box), methodology (WSTG, PTES, NIST), engagement window, and rules of engagement (DDoS off, prod vs staging). Output: signed SOW and ROE document.

2

Testing & Manual Exploitation

Two to four weeks for a typical engagement: reconnaissance, vulnerability identification, manual exploitation (not just scanner output), business logic testing, and post-exploitation/lateral movement where authorized. Daily check-ins so critical findings get patched mid-engagement.

3

Reporting & Re-Test

One to two weeks: structured report with CVSS v3.1 scoring, executive summary, technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence, and prioritized remediation guidance. Re-test of remediated findings included; remediated items get a closure stamp suitable for audit.

No Testing vs. Regular Testing

Why regular pen testing is critical.

Methodology

No Testing
Ad-hoc internal review or scanner-only
Jacobian Services
OWASP WSTG/ASVS, PTES, NIST 800-115 with manual exploitation

Compliance Evidence

No Testing
Audit findings on Requirement 11.3, CC7.1
Jacobian Services
Annual report with CVSS scoring satisfies PCI/SOC 2/ISO/HIPAA
Penetration Testing Guide
Whitepaper

Penetration Testing Guide

A guide to effective penetration testing.

Read the whitepaper

AI Red Teaming — Securing LLMs and ML Systems

Traditional penetration testing was not designed for AI systems. LLM-powered applications, ML pipelines, and model APIs introduce entirely new attack surfaces — from prompt injection and jailbreaking to training data extraction and model theft. TrustEdge.ai, our AI services division, provides specialized AI red teaming services that evaluate your AI systems against the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and emerging adversarial ML techniques, helping you deploy AI with confidence.

Explore AI Security Services

Penetration Testing FAQs

Common questions about penetration testing and AI red teaming.

Book a Penetration Test

Get a free scoping call with our security engineers.