FedRAMP & StateRAMP Authorization

Achieve FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, or StateRAMP authorization in 12-18 months -- 3PAO-coordinated implementation, continuous monitoring, and ongoing ATO maintenance.

Concentric hexagonal lattice rings representing layered compliance controls for FedRAMP

Government Cloud Authorization Done Right

FedRAMP and StateRAMP are the prerequisites for selling to U.S. federal and state government agencies. They are not optional, they are not fast, and they are not cheap -- a typical FedRAMP Moderate authorization spans 12-18 months and runs into the high-six-figures or low-seven-figures all-in. The decision to pursue FedRAMP is a go-to-market commitment, not a checkbox item. We help you decide whether the path makes sense for your business, and if it does, we run the program.

Our FedRAMP playbook starts with sponsorship strategy: Joint Authorization Board (JAB) Provisional Authorization is the highest bar and the most reusable, but requires NIST 800-53 control implementation across the full Moderate baseline (300+ controls) and a willing federal sponsor. Agency Authority to Operate (ATO) is faster to first contract but produces an authorization that other agencies must independently approve. Most early FedRAMP candidates pursue Agency ATO with their lead federal customer, then expand. StateRAMP follows a similar model but state-by-state, with the StateRAMP PMO handling reciprocity.

Implementation is the engineering-heavy phase: System Security Plan (SSP) authoring, control implementation across NIST 800-53 Rev 5 (with FedRAMP-specific overlays), 3PAO (third-party assessment organization) coordination, Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) management, and continuous monitoring infrastructure that satisfies the monthly vulnerability scanning, annual penetration testing, and ongoing change-management evidence requirements. Our SREs build this in code -- the same Terraform modules that provision your AWS GovCloud environment also generate the configuration baseline evidence FedRAMP requires.

Layered compliance program architecture with audit-ready control evidence

Why Choose Our FedRAMP & StateRAMP Authorization

Engineering rigor, audit-ready process, and operational depth across cloud, SaaS, and software delivery

Sponsorship Strategy

JAB vs Agency ATO decision support, federal sponsor identification, and FedRAMP marketplace positioning. Most customers benefit from a hybrid: Agency ATO with lead customer, then JAB pursuit once revenue justifies.

Sponsorship Strategy

Engineering-Led Implementation

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 controls implemented in Terraform — not bolted on. AWS GovCloud architecture, FIPS 140-2 validated cryptography, SSP authored with control responsibility matrix.

Engineering-Led Implementation

3PAO Coordination

We work with FedRAMP-accredited 3PAOs (e.g., Coalfire, A-LIGN, Schellman) and manage the assessment cycle end-to-end. Pre-assessment readiness, evidence package, on-site coordination, POA&M response.

3PAO Coordination

Continuous Monitoring

Monthly vulnerability scans, annual penetration testing, ongoing change-management evidence, and the ConMon submissions FedRAMP and StateRAMP PMOs require. Audit-ready year-round.

Continuous Monitoring

Our FedRAMP & StateRAMP Process

From sponsorship strategy to authorization in 12-18 months

1

Sponsorship & Scoping

Months 1-2: identify federal sponsor (or StateRAMP equivalent), choose impact level (Moderate vs High), define system boundary, gap-analyze current controls against NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baseline. Output: a SOW with explicit timeline and cost commitments.

2

Architecture & SSP Authoring

Months 2-5: AWS GovCloud (or Azure Government) architecture design, FIPS 140-2 cryptographic implementation, full System Security Plan with control responsibility matrix, configuration baseline documentation.

3

Control Implementation

Months 4-9: implement the 300+ Moderate baseline controls (or 400+ High baseline) in Terraform and supporting documentation. Continuous monitoring infrastructure deployment. Evidence collection automation.

4

3PAO Assessment

Months 9-13: coordinate 3PAO assessment, manage on-site interviews, respond to findings via POA&M. Typical 3-4 month assessment cycle with ongoing remediation.

5

Authorization & ConMon

Months 13-18: package submitted to JAB or Agency for authorization decision. Ongoing continuous monitoring (monthly scans, annual pen tests, ConMon reports) maintains authorization year-over-year.

DIY FedRAMP vs. Specialist FedRAMP Engagement

Why FedRAMP isn't where you DIY your first compliance program

Timeline to Authorization

DIY or Generalist Compliance Vendor
24-36 months with high failure rate; budget overruns common
Jacobian Services
12-18 months with explicit go/no-go gates and committed timeline

Control Implementation

DIY or Generalist Compliance Vendor
Documentation-heavy with manual evidence collection
Jacobian Services
Controls implemented in Terraform with auto-generated evidence

3PAO Relationship

DIY or Generalist Compliance Vendor
First-time engagement, learning the process during the assessment
Jacobian Services
Pre-existing relationships with 3-4 FedRAMP 3PAOs; we know the assessor scoring patterns

AWS GovCloud Setup

DIY or Generalist Compliance Vendor
Often a 6-month subsidiary project that delays the assessment
Jacobian Services
GovCloud architecture is standard playbook; deployed and validated in 4-6 weeks

Ongoing ConMon

DIY or Generalist Compliance Vendor
Manual monthly scan reports, often late or incomplete
Jacobian Services
Automated ConMon evidence pipeline; monthly submissions on time, year over year
FedRAMP Authorization Playbook
Whitepaper

FedRAMP Authorization Playbook

Read our FedRAMP playbook -- JAB vs Agency ATO sponsorship strategy, AWS GovCloud architecture, NIST 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 3PAO process, ConMon obligations.

Read the whitepaper

FedRAMP & StateRAMP FAQs

What CTOs and compliance leads ask before committing to FedRAMP

Ready for FedRAMP Authorization?

Engage our team for sponsorship strategy and a 12-18 month authorization roadmap.